Aurelius  Clemens Prudentius

                     A Christian poet, boen in the Tarraconensis, Northern Spain, 348; died probably
                     in Spain, after 405. He must have been born a Christian, for he nowhere speaks
                     of his conversion. The place of his birth is uncertain; it may have been
                     Saragossa, Tarragona, or Calahorra. He practised law with some success, and in
                     later life deplored the zeal he had devoted to his profession. He was twice
                     provincial governor, perhaps in his native country, before the emperor summoned
                     him to court. Towards the end of his life Prudentius renounced the vanities of the
                     world to practise a rigorous asceticism, fasting until evening (Cath., iii, 88) and
                     abstaining entirely from animal food (ibid., 56). The Christian poems were written
                     during this period; he later collected them and wrote a preface, which he himself
                     dated 405. A little before (perhaps in 403) he had to go to Rome, doubtless to
                     make some appeal to the emperor. A number of his poems (Peristephanon, vii,
                     ix, xi, xii, xiv) were written subsequently to this journey, of which he took
                     advantage to visit the sanctuaries and tombs of the martyrs. "Contra
                     Symmachum" must have been written at Rome; the second book belongs to the
                     period between 29 March and December, 403. All other works antedate the
                     journey to Rome.

                     Prudentius wrote to glorify God and atone for his sins. His works fall into three
                     groups: lyrical, didactic, and polemical. The lyrics form two collections. In the
                     "Cathemerinon" the hymns are for the sanctification of the hours of the day or
                     certain important occasions, such as Christmas, the Epiphany, obsequies, etc.
                     Some continue the liturgical tradition of Saint Ambrose, and are written in the
                     Ambrosian iambic dimeter; others are an attempt to enlist the metres of Horace
                     in the service of Christian lyrical poetry. Despite his negligence Prudentius
                     displays more art than Ambrose. Hymn xii, on the feast of the Epiphany,
                     contains the two celebrated stanzas, "Saluete flores martyrum", characterized
                     by profound feeling united to the purest art; hymn x on burial is likewise very
                     remarkable. However, his style is generally diffuse, and the hymns admitted to
                     the Roman Breviary had to be curtailed. The "Peristephanon" is dedicated to the
                     glory of the martyrs: Emeterius and Chelidonius of Calahorra, Lawrence the
                     Deacon, Eulalia, the eighteen martyrs of Saragossa, Vincent, Fructuosus with
                     Augurius and Eulogius, Quirinus of Siscia, the martyrs of Calahorra put to death
                     on the site of the baptistery, Cassianus of the Forum Cornelium, Romanus,
                     Hippolytus, Peter and Paul, Cyprian, and Agnes. Taken altogether, it is an
                     endeavour to endow Christianity with a lyrical poetry independent of liturgical
                     uses and traditions. Unfortunately, neither Prudentius's talent nor current taste
                     favoured such an enterprise. The narratives are spoiled with too much rhetoric.
                     There are, however, beautiful passages, a kind of grave power, and some pretty
                     details, as in the hymns on St. Eulalia (see v. 206-15) and St. Agnes. Certain
                     others, such as that on St. Hippolytus, have an archæological interest. The
                     whole collection is curious, but of unequal merit.

                     The two principal didactic poems are the "Apotheosis", on the dogma of the
                     Trinity, and the "Hamartigenia", on the origin of sin. One is somewhat astonished
                     to find Prudentius attacking ancient heresies, such as those of Sabellius and
                     Marcian, and having nothing to say on Arianism. It is due to the fact that he
                     closely follows and imitates Tertullian, whose rugged genius resembles his own.
                     These poems are interesting examples of passionate, glowing abstractions,
                     precise exposition being combined with poetic fantasy. Some brilliant scenes,
                     like the sacrifice of Julian (Apot.h., 460), merit quotation. The comparison of
                     souls led astray by sin with doves caught in snares (Ham., 779) has a charm
                     that recalls the happy inspiration of "Saluete flores". Orthodoxy is his great
                     preoccupation in these poems, and he invokes all kinds of punishments on
                     heresy. Yet he is not always free from error, here or elsewhere. He believes that
                     only a small number of souls are lost (Cath., vi, 95). It is an exaggeration of the
                     meaning of his metaphors to assert that he makes the soul material. The
                     "Psychomachia "is the model of a style destined to be lovingly cultivated in the
                     Middle Ages, i. e., allegorical poetry, of which before Prudentius only the merest
                     traces are found (in such authors as Apuleius, Tertullian, and Claudian). In
                     Tertullian's "De Spectaculis", 29, we find its first conception; he personifies the
                     vices and the virtues and shows them contending for the soul. The army of vices
                     is that of idolatry, the army of the virtues that of faith. The poem is, therefore, at
                     once moral and apologetic. It would be difficult to imagine anything more
                     unfortunate or insupportable. Incidents, action, and characters of the Æneid are
                     here travestied, and the deplorable effect is heightened by the borrowing of
                     numerous hemistichs divested of their proper meaning. The "Dittochæon",
                     forty-nine hexameter tetrastichs commenting on various events of the Old and
                     New Testament, must be included among the didactic poems of Prudentius.
                     Doubts have been raised regarding the authenticity of these verses but with very
                     little reason. Gennadius (De viris illustr., xiii) furthermore attributes to Prudentius,
                     mistakenly perhaps, a "Hexaemeron" of which we know nothing.

                     His most personal work is the invective against Symmachus. It shows how the
                     Christians reconciled their patriotism with their faith. Prudentius identifies the
                     Church with Rome and, in thus transforming it, preserves that ancient belief in
                     the eternity of the city. He can be impartial towards the pagan and praise him for
                     services rendered the State. He is proud of the senate, seeing its majority
                     Christian. Christianity is come to crown the Roman institutions. Romans are
                     superior to the barbarians, as man is superior to the animals. These two books
                     against Symmachus undertake, therefore, to solve the problem which presented
                     itself to the mind of the still hesitant pagan. A genius more powerful than pliant,
                     Prudentius displays a more versatile and richer talent than that of his pagan
                     contemporary, Claudian. The rhetoric he disparages, he himself misuses; he
                     often exaggerates, but is never commonplace. The superior of many pagan
                     poets, among the Christian he is the greatest and the most truly poetic. His style
                     is not bad considering the period in which he wrote, and, while there are
                     occasional errors in his prosody due to the pronunciation then current, he shows
                     himself a careful versifier and has the gift (then become rare) of varying his
                     metres. An edition of Prudentius is to appear in the "Corpus" of Vienna, edited by
                     J. Bergman. The best manuscript is at Paris, in the Bibliothèque Nationale, Latin
                     department, 8084; on one of its margins is the half-effaced name of Vettius
                     Agorius Basilius Mavortius (consul in 527), who made a recension of the works of
                     Horace. This manuscript is free from the dogmatic corrections which are found in
                     others.

                     GLOVER, Life and Letters in the Fourth Century (Cambridge, 1901), 249-77; SCHANZ, Gesch. der
                     röm. Litteratur, IV, I, 211; PUECH, Prudence (Paris, 1888); LEASE, A Syntactic, Stylistic and
                     Metrical Study of Prudentius (Baltimore, 1895); ROBERT, Notice sur le Manuscript de Prudence B.
                     N. lat. 8084 in Mélanges Graux (Paris, 1884), 406; BERGMAN, De codicum prudentianorum
                     generibus et virtute in Sitzungsberichte d. Wiener Akademie, CLVII, n. 5; LOCK in Dict. Christ.
                     Biog., s. v.

                     Paul  Lejay
                     Transcribed by Douglas J. Potter
                     Dedicated to the Immaculate Heart of the Blessed Virgin Mary

                                       The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume XII
                                    Copyright © 1908 by Robert Appleton Company
                                    Online Edition Copyright © 1999 by Kevin Knight
                                        Nihil Obstat. Remy Lafort, Censor
                                   Imprimatur. +John M. Farley, Archbishop of New York

The Catholic Encyclopedia: NewAdvent.org